Blessed be God and
the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who according to the riches of his mercy
[Eph. 1:3, 7] has preserved in his church this sacrament at least, untouched
and untainted by the ordinances of men, and has made it free to all nations and
classes of mankind, and has not permitted it to be oppressed by the filthy and
godless monsters of greed and superstition. For he desired that by it little
children, who were incapable of greed and superstition, might be initiated and
sanctified in the simple faith of his Word; even today baptism has its chief
blessing for them. But if the intention had been to give this sacrament to
adults and older people, I do not believe that it could possibly have retained
its power and its glory against the tyranny of greed and superstition which has
overthrown all things divine among us. Here too the wisdom of the flesh would
doubtless have devised its preparations and dignities, its reservations,
restrictions, and other like snares for catching money, until water brought as
high a price as parchment does now.
But Satan, though he
could not quench the power of baptism in little children, nevertheless
succeeded in quenching it in all adults, so that now there are scarcely any who
call to mind their own baptism, and still fewer who glory in it; so many other
ways have been discovered for remitting sins and getting to heaven. The source
of these false opinions is that dangerous saying of St. Jerome—either
unhappily phrased or wrongly interpreted—in which he terms penance “the second
plank after shipwreck,” as if baptism were not penance. Hence, when men have
fallen into sin, they despair of the “first plank,” which is the ship, as if it
had gone under, and begin to put all their trust and faith in the second plank,
which is penance. This has given rise to those endless burdens of vows,
religious orders, works, satisfactions, pilgrimages, indulgences, and monastic
sects, and from them in turn has arisen that flood of books, questions,
opinions, and man-made ordinances which the whole world cannot contain. Thus
the church of God is incomparably worse off under this tyranny than the
synagogue or any other nation under heaven ever was.
It was the duty of
the pontiffs to remove all these evils and to put forth every effort to recall
Christians to the true understanding of baptism, so that they might know what
manner of men they were and how Christians ought to live. But instead of this,
their only work today is to lead the people as far astray as possible from
their baptism, to immerse all men in the flood of their tyranny, and to cause
the people of Christ (as the prophet says) to forget him days without number
[Jer. 2:32]. How unregenerate are all who bear the name of pontiff today! For
they neither know nor do what is becoming to pontiffs, but they are ignorant of
what they ought to know and do. They fulfil what Isa. 56[:10, 11] says: “His
watchmen are blind, they are all without knowledge; the shepherds also have no
understanding; they have all turned to their own way, each to his own gain,
etc.”
Now, the first
thing to be considered about baptism is the divine promise, which says: “He who
believes and is baptized will be saved” [Mark 16:16]. This promise must be set
far above all the glitter of works, vows, religious orders, and whatever else
man has introduced, for on it all our salvation depends. But we must so
consider it as to exercise our faith in it, and have no doubt whatever that,
once we have been baptized, we are saved. For unless faith is present or is
conferred in baptism, baptism will profit us nothing; indeed, it will become a
hindrance to us, not only at the moment when it is received, but throughout the
rest of our lives. That kind of unbelief accuses God’s promise of being a lie,
and this is the greatest of all sins. If we set ourselves to this exercise of
faith, we shall at once perceive how difficult it is to believe this promise of
God. For our human weakness, conscious of its sins, finds nothing more
difficult to believe than that it is saved or will be saved; and yet, unless it
does believe this, it cannot be saved, because it does not believe the truth of
God that promises salvation.
This message should
have been impressed upon the people untiringly, and this promise should have
been dinned into their ears without ceasing. Their baptism should have been
called to their minds again and again, and their faith constantly awakened and
nourished. For just as the truth of this divine promise, once pronounced over
us, continues until death, so our faith in it ought never to cease, but to be
nourished and strengthened until death by the continual remembrance of this
promise made to us in baptism. Therefore, when we rise from our sins or repent,
we are merely returning to the power and the faith of baptism from which we
fell, and finding our way back to the promise then made to us, which we
deserted when we sinned. For the truth of the promise once made remains
steadfast, always ready to receive us back with open arms when we return. And
this, if I mistake not, is what they mean when they say, though obscurely, that
baptism is the first sacrament and the foundation of all the others, without which
none of the others can be received.
It will therefore be
no small gain to a penitent to remember above all his baptism, and, confidently
calling to mind the divine promise which he has forsaken, acknowledge that
promise before his Lord, rejoicing that he is still within the fortress of salvation
because he has been baptized, and abhorring his wicked ingratitude in falling
away from its faith and truth. His heart will find wonderful comfort and will
be encouraged to hope for mercy when he considers that the promise which God
made to him, which cannot possibly lie, is still unbroken and unchanged, and
indeed, cannot be changed by sins, as Paul says (II Tim. 2[:13]): “If we are
faithless, he remains faithful—for he cannot deny himself.” This truth of God,
I say, will sustain him, so that if all else should fail, this truth, if he
believes in it, will not fail him. In it the penitent has a shield against all
assaults of the scornful enemy, an answer to the sins that disturb his
conscience, an antidote for the dread of death and judgment, and a comfort in
every temptation—namely, this one truth—when he says: “God is faithful in his
promises [Heb. 10:23; 11:11], and I received his sign in baptism. If God is for
me, who is against me?” [Rom. 8:31].
The children of
Israel, whenever they turned to repentance, remembered above all their exodus
from Egypt, and remembering turned back to God who had brought them out. Moses
impressed this memory and this protection upon them many times, and David
afterwards did the same. How much more ought we to remember our exodus from
Egypt, and by this remembrance turn back to him who led us through the washing
of regeneration [Titus 3:5], remembrance of which is commended to us for this
very reason! This can be done most fittingly in the sacrament of bread and
wine. Indeed, in former times these three sacraments—penance, baptism, and the
bread—were all celebrated at the same service, and each one supplemented the
other. We also read of a certain holy virgin who in every time of temptation
made baptism her sole defense, saying simply, “I am a Christian”; and
immediately the enemy recognized the power of baptism and of her faith, which
clung to the truth of a promising God, and fled from her.
Thus you see how rich
a Christian is, that is, one who has been baptized! Even if he would, he could
not lose his salvation, however much he sinned, unless he refused to believe.
For no sin can condemn him save unbelief alone. All other sins, so long as the
faith in God’s promise made in baptism returns or remains, are immediately
blotted out through that same faith, or rather through the truth of God,
because he cannot deny himself if you confess him and faithfully cling to him
in his promise. But as for contrition, confession of sins, and satisfaction,
along with all those carefully devised exercises of men: if you rely on them
and neglect this truth of God, they will suddenly fail you and leave you more
wretched than before. For whatever is clone without faith in God’s truth is
vanity of vanities and vexation of spirit [Eccles. 1:2, 14].
You will likewise see
how perilous, indeed, how false it is to suppose that penance is “the second
plank after shipwreck,” and how pernicious an error it is to believe that the
power of baptism is broken, and the ship dashed to pieces, because of sin. The
ship remains one, solid, and invincible; it will never be broken up into
separate “planks.” In it are carried all those who are brought to the harbor of
salvation, for it is the truth of God giving us its promise in the sacraments.
Of course, it often happens that many rashly leap overboard into the sea and
perish; these are those who abandon faith in the promise and plunge into sin.
But the ship itself remains intact and holds its course unimpaired. If any one
is able somehow by grace to return to the ship, it is not on any plank, but in
the solid ship itself that he is borne to life. Such a person is the one who
returns through faith to the abiding and enduring promise of God. Therefore
Peter, in II Pet. 1[:9], rebukes those who sin, because they have forgotten
that they were cleansed from their old sins, and he clearly rebukes their
wicked unbelief and their ingratitude for the baptism they had received.
What is the good,
then, of writing so much about baptism and yet not teaching this faith in the
promise? All the sacraments were instituted to nourish faith. Yet these godless
men pass over it so completely as even to assert that a man dare not be certain
of the forgiveness of sins or the grace of the sacraments. With such wicked
teaching they delude the world, and not only take captive, but altogether
destroy, the sacrament of baptism, in which the chief glory of our conscience
consists. Meanwhile they madly rage against the miserable souls of men with
their contritions, anxious confessions, circumstances, satisfactions, works,
and endless other such absurdities. Therefore read with great caution the
“Master Of the Sentences” in his fourth book; better yet, despise him
with all his commentators, who at their best write only of the “matter” and
“form” of the sacraments; that is, they treat of the dead and death-dealing
letter [II Cor. 3:6] of the sacraments, but leave untouched the spirit, life,
and use, that is, the truth of the divine promise and our faith.
Beware, therefore,
that the external pomp of works and the deceits of man-made ordinances do not
deceive you, lest you wrong the divine truth and your faith. If you would be
saved, you must begin with the faith of the sacraments, without any works
whatever. The works will follow faith, but do not think too lightly of faith,
for it is the most excellent and difficult of all works. Through it alone you
will be saved, even if you should be compelled to do without any other works.
For faith is a work of God, not of man, as Paul teaches [Eph. 2:8]. The other
works he works through us and with our help, but this one alone he works in us
and without our help.
From this we can
clearly see the difference in baptism between man who administers the sacrament
and God who is its author. For man baptizes, and yet does not baptize. He
baptizes in that he performs the work of immersing the person to be baptized;
he does not baptize, because in so doing he acts not on his own authority but
in God’s stead. Hence we ought to receive baptism at human hands just as if
Christ himself, indeed, God himself, were baptizing us with his own hands. For
it is not man’s baptism, but Christ’s and God’s baptism, which we receive by
the hand of a man, just as everything else that we have through the hand of
somebody else is God’s alone. Therefore beware of making any distinction in
baptism by ascribing the outward part to man and the inward part to God.
Ascribe both to God alone, and look upon the person administering it as simply
the vicarious instrument of God, by which the Lord sitting in heaven thrusts
you under the water with his own hands, and promises you forgiveness of your
sins, speaking to you upon earth with a human voice by the mouth of his
minister.
This the words
themselves indicate, when the priest says: “I baptize you in the name of the
Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen,” and not: “I baptize you
in my own name.” It is as though he said: “What I do, I do not by my own
authority, but in the name and stead of God, so that you should regard it just
as if our Lord himself had done it in a visible manner. The Doer and the
minister are different persons, but the work of both is the same work, or
rather, it is the work of the Doer alone, through my ministry.” For I hold that
“in the name of” refers to the person of the Doer, so that the name of the Lord
is not only to be uttered and invoked while the work is being done; but the
work itself is to be done as something not one’s own—in the name and stead of
Another. In this sense Christ says in Matt. 24[:5], “Many will come in my
name,” and Rom. 1[:5] says, “Through whom we have received grace and
apostleship to bring about obedience for the sake of his name among all the
nations.”
This view I heartily
endorse, for there is great comfort and a mighty aid to faith in the knowledge
that one has been baptized, not by man, but by the Triune God himself, through
a man acting among us in His name. This will put an end to that idle dispute
about the “form” of baptism, as they term the words which are used. The Greeks
say: “May the servant of Christ be baptized,” while the Latins say: “I
baptize.” Others again, adhering rigidly to their pedantry, condemn the use of
the words, “I baptize you in the name of Jesus Christ,” although it is certain
the apostles used this formula in baptizing, as we read in the Acts of the
Apostles [2:38; 10:48; 19:5]; they would allow no other form to be valid than
this: “I baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy
Ghost. Amen.” But their contention is in vain, for they bring no proof, but
merely assert their own dreams. Baptism truly saves in whatever way it is
administered, if only it is administered not in the name of man, but in the
name of the Lord. Indeed, I have no doubt that if anyone receives baptism in
the name of the Lord, even if the wicked minister should not give it in the
name of the Lord, he would yet be truly baptized in the name of the Lord. For
the power of baptism depends not so much on the faith or use of the one who
confers it as on the faith or use of the one who receives it. We have an
example of this in the story of a certain actor who was baptized in jest.
These and similar perplexing disputes and questions are raised for us by those
who ascribe nothing to faith and everything to works and rituals, whereas we
owe everything to faith alone and nothing to rituals. Faith makes us free in
spirit from all those scruples and fancies.
The second
part of baptism is the sign, or sacrament, which is that immersion in water
from which it derives its name, for the Greek baptizo means “I immerse,” and baptisma means “immersion.” For, as has been said, along with the divine
promises signs have also been given to picture that which the words signify, or
as they now say, that which the sacrament “effectively signifies.” We shall see
how much truth there is in this.
A great majority have
supposed that there is some hidden spiritual power in the word and water, which
works the grace of God in the soul of the recipient. Others deny this and hold
that there is no power in the sacraments, but that grace is given by God alone,
who according to his covenant is present in the sacraments which he has
instituted. Yet all are agreed that the sacraments are “effective signs” of
grace, and they reach this conclusion by this one argument: if the sacraments
of the New Law were mere signs, there would be no apparent reason why they
should surpass those of the Old Law. Hence they have been driven to attribute
such great powers to the sacraments of the New Law that they think the sacraments
benefit even those who are in mortal sin; neither faith nor grace are
required—it is sufficient that no obstacle be set in the way, that is, no
actual intention to sin again.
Such views, however,
must be carefully avoided and shunned, because they are godless and infidel,
contrary to faith and inconsistent with the nature of the sacraments. For it is
an error to hold that the sacraments of the New Law differ from those of the
Old Law in the effectiveness of their signs. For in this respect they are the
same. The same God who now saves us by baptism and the bread, saved Abel by his
sacrifice, Noah by the rainbow, Abraham by circumcision, and all the others by
their respective signs. So far as the signs are concerned, there is no
difference between a sacrament of the Old Law and one of the New, provided that
by the Old Law you mean that which God did among the patriarchs and other
fathers in the days of the Law. But those signs which were given to the
patriarchs and fathers must be clearly distinguished from the legal symbols [figurae] which Moses instituted in his law, such as the priestly usages
concerning vestments, vessels, foods, houses, and the like. For these are
vastly different, not only from the sacraments of the New Law, but also from
those signs which God occasionally gave to the fathers living under the law,
such as the sign of Gideon’s fleece [Judg. 6:36–40], Manoah’s sacrifice [Judg.
13:16–23], or that which Isaiah offered to Ahaz in Isa. 7[:10–14]. In each of
these alike some promise was given which required faith in God.
The difference, then,
between the legal symbols and the new and old signs is that the legal symbols
do not have attached to them any word of promise requiring faith. Hence they
are not signs of justification, for they are not sacraments of the faith that
alone justifies, but only sacraments of works. Their whole power and nature
consisted in works, not in faith. Whoever performed them fulfilled them, even
if he did it without faith. But our signs or sacraments, as well as those of
the fathers, have attached to them a word of promise which requires faith, and
they cannot be fulfilled by any other work. Hence they are signs or sacraments
of justification, for they are sacraments of justifying faith and not of works.
Their whole efficacy, therefore, consists in faith itself, not in the doing of
a work. Whoever believes them, fulfils them, even if he should not do a single
work. This is the origin of the saying: “Not the sacrament, but the faith of
the sacrament, justifies.” Thus circumcision did not justify Abraham and his
seed, and yet the Apostle calls it the seal of the righteousness by faith [Rom.
4:11], because faith in the promise, to which circumcision was added, justified
him and fulfilled what the circumcision signified. For faith was the spiritual
circumcision of the foreskin of the heart [Deut. 10:16; Jer. 4:4], which was
symbolized by the literal circumcision of the flesh. In the same way it was
obviously not Abel’s sacrifice that justified him, but it was his faith [Heb.
11:4] by which he offered himself wholly to God, and this was symbolized by the
outward sacrifice.
Thus it is not
baptism that justifies or benefits anyone, but it is faith in that word of
promise to which baptism is added. This faith justifies, and fulfils that which
baptism signifies. For faith is the submersion of the old man and the emerging
of the new [Eph. 4:22–24; Col. 3:9–10]. Therefore the new sacraments cannot
differ from the old sacraments, for both alike have the divine promises and the
same spirit of faith, although they do differ vastly from the old symbols—on
account of the word of promise, which is the sole effective means of
distinguishing them. Even so, today, the outward show of vestments, holy
places, foods, and all the endless ceremonies doubtless symbolize excellent
things to be fulfilled in the spirit, yet, because there is no word of divine
promise attached to these things, they can in no way be compared with the signs
of baptism and the bread. Neither do they justify, nor benefit one in any way,
since they are fulfilled in their very observance, even in their observance
apart from faith. For while they are taking place, or being performed, they are
being fulfilled, as the Apostle says of them in Col. 2[:22]: “Which all perish
as they are used, according to human precepts and doctrines.” The sacraments,
on the contrary, are not fulfilled when they are taking place, but when they
are being believed.
It cannot be true,
therefore, that there is contained in the sacraments a power efficacious for
justification, or that they are “effective signs” of grace. All such things are
said to the detriment of faith, and out of ignorance of the divine promise. Unless
you should call them “effective” in the sense that they certainly and
effectively impart grace where faith is unmistakably present. But it is not in
this sense that efficacy is now ascribed to them; as witness the fact that they
are said to benefit all men, even the wicked and unbelieving, provided they do
not set an obstacle in the way—as if such unbelief were not in itself the most
obstinate and hostile of all obstacles to grace. To such an extent have they
exerted themselves to turn the sacrament into a command and faith into a work.
For if the sacrament confers grace on me because I receive it, then indeed I
receive grace by virtue of my work, and not by faith; and I gain not the
promise in the sacrament but only the sign instituted and commanded by God.
Thus you see clearly how completely the sacraments have been misunderstood by
the theologians of the Sentences. In their discussions of the sacraments
they have taken no account either of faith or of promise. They cling only to
the sign and the use of the sign, and draw us away from faith to the work, away
from the word to the sign. Thus, as I have said, they have not only taken the
sacraments captive, but have completely destroyed them, as far as they were
able.
Therefore let us open
our eyes and learn to pay heed more to the word than to the sign, more to faith
than to the work or use of the sign. We know that wherever there is a divine
promise, there faith is required, and that these two are so necessary to each
other that neither can be effective apart from the other. For it is not
possible to believe unless there is a promise, and the promise is not
established unless it is believed. But where these two meet, they give a real
and most certain efficacy to the sacraments. Hence, to seek the efficacy of the
sacrament apart from the promise and apart from the faith is to labor in vain
and to find condemnation. Thus Christ says: “He who believes and is baptized
will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned” [Mark 16:16]. He
shows us in this word that faith is such a necessary part of the sacrament that
it can save even without the sacrament, and for this reason he did not add: “He
who does not believe, and is not baptized.”
Baptism, then,
signifies two things—death and resurrection, that is, full and complete
justification. When the minister immerses the child in the water it signifies
death, and when he draws it forth again it signifies life. Thus Paul expounds
it in Rom. 6[:4]: “We were buried therefore with Christ by baptism into death,
so that as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too
might walk in newness of life.” This death and resurrection we call the new
creation, regeneration, and spiritual birth. This should not be understood only
allegorically as the death of sin and the life of grace, as many understand it,
but as actual death and resurrection. For baptism is not a false sign. Neither
does sin completely die, nor grace completely rise, until the sinful body that
we carry about in this life is destroyed, as the Apostle says in the same
passage [Rom. 6:6–7]. For as long as we are in the flesh, the desires of the
flesh stir and are stirred. For this reason, as soon as we begin to believe, we
also begin to die to this world and live to God in the life to come; so that
faith is truly a death and a resurrection, that is, it is that spiritual baptism
into which we are submerged and from which we rise.
It is therefore
indeed correct to say that baptism is a washing away of sins, but the
expression is too mild and weak to bring out the full significance of baptism,
which is rather a symbol of death and resurrection. For this reason I would
have those who are to be baptized completely immersed in the water, as the word
says and as the mystery indicates. Not because I deem this necessary, but
because it would be well to give to a thing so perfect and complete a sign
that is also complete and perfect. And this is doubtless the way in which it
was instituted by Christ. The sinner does not so much need to be washed as he
needs to die, in order to be wholly renewed and made another creature, and to
be conformed to the death and resurrection of Christ, with whom he dies and
rises again through baptism. Although you may say that when Christ died and
rose again he was washed clean of mortality, that is a less forceful way of
putting it than if you said that he was completely changed and renewed.
Similarly it is far more forceful to say that baptism signifies that we die in
every way and rise to eternal life, than to say that it signifies merely that
we are washed clean of sins.
Here again you see
that the sacrament of baptism, even with respect to its sign, is not a matter
of the moment, but something permanent. Although the ceremony itself is soon
over the thing it signifies continues until we die, yes, even until we rise on
the last day. For as long as we live we are continually doing that which
baptism signifies, that is, we die and rise again. We die, not only mentally
and spiritually by renouncing the sins and vanities of this world, but in very
truth we begin to leave this bodily life and to lay hold on the life to come,
so that there is, as they say, a “real” and bodily passing out of this world
unto the Father.
We must therefore
beware of those who have reduced the power of baptism to such small and slender
dimensions that, while they say grace is indeed inpoured by it, they maintain
that afterwards it is poured out again through sin, and that then one must reach
heaven by another way, as if baptism had now become entirely useless. Do not
hold such a view, but understand that this is the significance of baptism, that
through it you die and live again. Therefore, whether by penance or by any
other way, you can only return to the power of your baptism, and do again that
which you were baptized to do and which your baptism signified. Baptism never
becomes useless, unless you despair and refuse to return to its salvation. You
may indeed wander away from the sign for a time, but the sign is not therefore
useless. Thus, you have been once baptized in the sacrament, but you need
continually to be baptized by faith, continually to die and continually to
live. Baptism swallowed up your whole body and gave it forth again; in the same
way that which baptism signifies should swallow up your whole life, body and
soul, and give it forth again at the last day, clad in the robe of glory and
immortality. We are therefore never without the sign of baptism nor without the
thing it signifies. Indeed, we need continually to be baptized more and more,
until we fulfil the sign perfectly at the last day.
You will understand,
therefore, that whatever we do in this life which mortifies the flesh or
quickens the spirit has to do with our baptism. The sooner we depart this life,
the more speedily we fulfil our baptism; and the more cruelly we suffer, the
more successfully do we conform to our baptism. Hence the church was at its
best at the time when martyrs were being put to death every day and accounted
as sheep for the slaughter [Ps. 44:22; Rom. 8:36], for then the power of
baptism reigned supreme in the church, whereas today we have lost sight of this
power amid the multitude of works and doctrines of men. For our whole life
should be baptism, and the fulfilling of the sign or sacrament of baptism,
since we have been set free from all else and given over to baptism alone, that
is, to death and resurrection.
